Gayle Ruzicka’s Crusade Against Gardasil

I started this before my unintentional hiatus, when the bill itself was still a hot topic. I decided to complete it, as I think it is still relevant, both for the specific topic, and for the way it relates to the way we deal with other issues, like sex ed.

A new vaccine has been creating quite a stir on the political scene in a number of states around the nation, including Utah. Merck boasts that Gardasil can protect against the human papillomavirus (HPV), a leading cause of cervical cancer. Excited by the promise of this medication, a number of politicians around the nation have sought to promote the use of this vaccine, producing bills sponsoring anything from mandatory vaccinations to education and subsidization. in the recently ended session of the 57th Utah Legislature, district 46 Representative Karen Morgan sponsored HB 358, a bill which would originally have provided one-million dollars for the Utah Health Department to “establish a program to educate citizens about the risks of cervical cancer and prevention of cervical cancer and to begin an immunization program.” The bill was vehemently opposed by conservative legislators and leaders. In the end, the bill was passed, but as the neutered HB 358S02, in which the immunization campaign was removed, the education campaign was twisted to promote the conservative agenda, and the funding was gutted.

Fortunately John Huntsman Sr. has the compassion and integrity to have recently pledged to fully fund Morgan’s program.

What is it that so perturbed the Right about this vaccine? Gayle Ruzicka of the Eagle Forum was one of the most vocal opponents of Morgan’s bill, and is a good example. She expressed a number of concerns, among them skepticism of the safety of the vaccine and the conflict of interest in Merck helping to sponsor such legislation. These doubts certainly sound reasonable. I think it wise to be cautious about the sorts of promises and assurances made by corporate giants. Merck is, after all, the same corporation which gave us the Viox fiasco. All evidence I’ve seen suggests that while we cannot know for certain what the long-term impacts will be, Gardasil has been thoroughly tested. But I’m willing to explore the issue further. Additionally, I don’t like the idea of a corporation seeking to manipulate legislation in order to essentially guarantee themselves subsidized profits or marketing—especially for a multi-national corporation with revenues in the billions. Ruzicka’s apprehensions seem worth exploring.

But then there is the issue which destroys every shred of Ruzicka’s credibility.

Gayle Ruzicka, president of the Utah Eagle Forum, said mandating the vaccine is going too far. She also said that it’s not right to vaccinate children against bad behavior.

“Anytime you tell young people a vaccine is going to save them, you are sending the wrong message. Nothing is foolproof,” she said.

“The only thing we know that will guard against sexually transmitted disease is abstinence before marriage and fidelity after marriage. We cannot keep vaccinating our children against bad behavior. We need to teach them and trust them.” (Ogden Standard Examiner, “Many promote cervical cancer vaccine; others warn against it“)

In other words, Ruzicka doesn’t want girls to be vaccinated against this STD for fear that it would encourage promiscuity.

(we’ll put aside the fact that Ruzicka was less than honest in implying that Morgan’s intent was mandatory vaccinations, when HB 358 was only to education the public about the vaccine and make it available to everyone)

The issue is saving lives, and conservative leaders insist on making it an issue of sexual morality.

The reasoning just doesn’t make sense. Seatbelts and airbags do not encourage people to drive more recklessly. On the other hand, knowing the dangers of smoking hasn’t stopped tens of thousands of people from beginning the habit over the past few decades. Likewise, The risk of pregnancy has been around for as long as man has existed, and various venereal diseases have presumably been around almost as long, yet people have engaged in extra-marital sex virtually from the dawn of time. It is important to try to educate people on the risks we face for our decisions, but fear of the potential consequences seems a less than effective deterrent. Nor does it show much respect for the intelligence and character of our children if we feel we need to rely on fear to keep them on the straight and narrow.

The simple truth is that some young adults are going to have sex. Good and righteous parenting—unlike fear—will likely reduce the odds, but it is no guarantee. We’ve plenty of scriptural examples of good and righteous parents whose children fell into grievous sin (Lehi, both Almas, most of Jacob/Israel’s sons). Is the slim chance that fear will keep our daughters chaste worth the risk to their health and lives should they stray? I find the prospect ghastly.

Ruzicka seems to forget that women aren’t always truly in charge of their bodies. There were 920 reported rapes in Utah in 2005. Do they deserve to risk the disease for the sin of being victims? What about the women who may not actually be physically assaulted, but are coerced into sexual activity? Or the woman who is unaware that her husband is unfaithful, and is about to pass on the virus caught elsewhere?

I agree with Ruzicka that sexual intimacy is something which should be reserved for the bonds of marriage. Nor would I make this vaccine mandatory. But I deplore the interference in legislation in an impotent effort to further that agenda, and find it intolerable that so many conservatives would put that agenda above saving lives.

6 Responses to “Gayle Ruzicka’s Crusade Against Gardasil”

  1. Bradley Ross Says:

    You make some very persuasive points. Thanks for your perspective.

  2. Frank Staheli Says:

    We should not force innoculation. But we should let them choose. For Gayle Ruzicka to say that “we shouldn’t inoculate them against bad behavior” is way wide of the mark. Children who are sexually active have enough problems as it is.

    I used to belong to Eagle Forum (and I still count them as friends), but I stopped associating with them when I was invited to their Christmas party one year, and it seemed as though they relished discussing how many enemies they had and how they were going to defeat them.

    (This is why I’m not surprised at their defense of Sen. Chris Buttars’ recent racist comment in the legislature–because he seems to concoct and share the same enemies.)

    Interestingly, after a several-year hiatus, I received a Christmas card from Gayle Ruzicka this past year inviting me to come to their Christmas party!

    My wife and I didn’t go.


  3. Lisa Parkins Says:

    There is more to it than what you are saying. By their own admission, this vaccine is only good for a few years, so unless you think your child is going to be sexually active by age 11, there is no reason to vaccinate at age 4 and so on. Keep your eyes wide open, they make their money by selling vaccines, whether needed or not. Don’t be fooled, do your homework on the disclosed side effects and then check into the undisclosed side effects of this company’s other drugs and ask yourself, which is riskier – a treatable STD or the side effects that kick in untreatable long term auto immune disorders. By the way, you should give Gayle respect for holding to her values. While most people sway with the wind, she holds firm. In other words, she isn’t a limp noodle following the sheep to slaughter.

  4. Alex Ron Says:

    After going through your perfectly structured and point hitting article, I have decided to share it with my blog viewers. Can I have your write-up republished on my website with a link back to your website? I find it beneficial and also interesting for my teaming readers and since I don’t have much time to write new content frequently, my guests will be kept up to date from your tremendous knowledge.

  5. Shout Says:

    Lisa Parkins, Check your facts. The vaccine is good for more than “a few years”. It is better to give it to persons before they become sexually active. Also, HPV is not a “treatable STD”. It is a VIRUS, meaning it won’t go away. There is no cure.

  6. films erotique en streaming gratuit Says:

    You should participate in a contest for among the best blogs
    on the web. I will suggest this site!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: