Artificial Timetables

Its finally happened. The Democrats stuck to their guns and sent President Bush a spending bill which included a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq. And, as he promised to do, Bush vetoed the bill. Now comes the tricky part: working out a compromise that will be accepted. While Congress doesn’t seem to have the two-thirds majority necessary to override the President’s veto, I hope they take a strong stand and force the administration to accept a true compromise, rather than a capitulation.

Over the course of the last few weeks, I’ve heard Bush repeat again and again (just one example here) that he would not accept a spending bill which included “artificial timetables” for withdrawing the troops. Personally, I don’t understand. What better than artificial timetables for a war undertaken for artificial justifications?

Infamous as President Bush is for his verbal blunders, I wonder if this isn’t one of his malapropisms. I wouldn’t be surprised if what he means is “arbitrary timelines.” It seems to fit. And if so, the idea of arbitrary timelines seems rather appropriate for a war arbitrarily undertaken.

4 Responses to “Artificial Timetables”

  1. jennifer Says:

    Right you are! Seems to me that timelines would be very appropriate, and the president’s unwillingness to accept any shows his true motivations. Amazing.

  2. Jessica Says:

    It shows me he will not accept defeat, not yet. The troop surge deserves a try, the Iraqi’s devserve it, the troops deserve it and the fallen troops deserve it. They deserve VICTORY!

  3. Part of the Plan Says:


    How do you define VICTORY?

  4. Derek Staffanson Says:

    And why does an escalation in force “deserve” a try?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: